There are different types of costing methods that are used to determine the final profit. When based on charge allocation, it is simply termed as Activity-Based Cost. When based on overhead allocation, it is termed as a Traditional type of cost.
Activity Based Costing vs Traditional Costing
The main difference between Activity-Based Costing and Traditional Costing is that in activity-based costing post factors are taken into charge. On the other hand in traditional costing pre factors that are already known, will be taken into final charge.
Activity-based costing will compute the final cost after counting all the activities that were completed. This makes it accurate as there will be less scope for mathematical errors. However, it will not make you hefty profits, as compared to its alternatives.
Traditional Costing will evaluate the final cost after accounting for all the predetermined forms of activities. This makes it less accurate when compared to its alternatives but more profitable. This type of costing method is used by companies who are aiming to make a high-profit margin.
Comparison Table Between Activity Based Costing and Traditional Costing
|Parameters of Comparison||Activity Based Costing||Traditional Costing|
|Meaning||This method evaluates the indirect cost||This method evaluates the cost before the due date|
|Cost||This method has less expensive computing cost||This method has a more expensive computing cost|
|Advantage||It produces a precise output||It produces a net profit|
|Disadvantage||The profit made will not be exponential||The cost of general overheads is not included|
|Significance||Facilities, Units||Product manufacturing, batches|
What is Activity Based Costing?
Activity-based costing can be defined as allocating additional charges which can be direct and Indirect. These charges may include utilities and salaries related to several products and services.
This specific task derives the fundamental cost for the ABC system. The cost can include setting up of machines or purchase of orders. It can also allocate the cost of miscellaneous pieces of equipment required for the completion of the activity.
This is also called the driving cost. Which eventually decides the overheads or additional charges that are going to be allocated in Activity-based costing. The core advantage of Activity Based Costing was better strategic planning.
This system of pricing allows companies to have a better pricing plan. Since it is absolutely precise, the organization does not have to double-check its cost evaluation.
Activity-Based Costing also derives profit for both the company and the customer. In the longer run, the customer gets better services and the company receives appropriate pricing for that service.
The formula for calculating Activity Based Costing is the total pool of cost upon cost driver. This gives the net cost driver rate.
Traditional Based Costing
Traditional-based costing can be defined as the method of generating a profit by accounting for product manufacturing. This works by adding indirect(or overheads) to the total manufacturing cost.
This type of system depends on applying rates that are based on metrics, by computing the total overhead cost rate. These driving rates are often approximate or estimated.
Traditional costing is a faster mode of implying charges. Mainly because it includes very few variables compared to Activity-based costing. However, this also makes it an imprecise process, because it carries significantly less information.
Traditional Based Costing also requires zero additional software for its computation. The process of calculation is simple and can easily be done normally. Hence expensive software is not required in this form of accounting.
Most companies or organizations that are inclined to optimize their profits, prefer this system of accounting. Especially in the field of imports and exports.
The formula for calculating traditional-based costing is dividing the total cost by the driving rate of overhead charges. This will give the per unit charge that will incur in the amount. Based on the number of units, this overhead can be added to calculate the final value of Traditional Based Costing.
Main Differences between Activity Based Costing and Traditional Costing
- Activity Based Costing is precise while Traditional Costing is not so precise.
- Activity Based Costing is calculated after the completion of activities whereas Traditional Costing is calculated in advance.
- Activity Based Costing has a budget rate of computation whereas Traditional Costing is much more expensive to compute.
- Activity Based Costing generally accounts for only two activities while Traditional Costing can account for up to four activities.
- Activity Based costing is preferred by firm owners whereas Traditional costing is preferred by batch owners.
Different types of costing methods are required for multiple organizations. Some will prefer the first form of evaluation while many will opt for the second one. However, the selection process of these methods will depend on the type of organization.
Activity-Based Organization will be implemented in most trade unions. Only Foremost activities are needed to be counted in such facilities. Therefore this method will remain their go-to option.
The second form of costing which is traditional will be opted by organizations looking for additional profits. Moreover, it can also be implemented by organizations that are finishing their workload in advance. This is why it is a go-to option for business batches.
These types of methods prove to be of great help to the business and job sector. Both employers and employees receive several types of benefits from this computation process. Some opine that the former is good for the employee while the latter is significant for the boss.
These costing methods are also essential for the economy. The continued computation helps to generate employment and keeps churning the overall profit. economies that run on indirect cost evaluation receive their growth from traditional costing. Similarly, economies that run on direct costing receive their growth factor from activity-based costing.